College use of race in admissions challenged at Supreme Court in arguments

- Advertisement -


  • The Supreme Court begins hearing arguments in two cases that challenge the use of race-based considerations to determine who gets into US colleges and universities.
  • The cases attack the affirmative action idea in admissions to Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
  • “Racial classifications are wrong,” attorney Patrick Strawbridge on behalf of the group Students for Fair Admissions.

- Advertisement -

The Supreme Court on Monday began hearing arguments in two cases that challenge the use of race-based considerations to determine admission to US colleges.

- Advertisement -

The argument, which is expected to continue for several hours, stems from lawsuits at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina against affirmative action in admissions.

“Racial classifications are wrong,” attorney Patrick Strawbridge said in his opening argument on behalf of the group Students for Fair Admissions.

- Advertisement -

“This court has always said that racial classifications are unreasonable,” Strawbridge responded to Justice Clarence Thomas, a conservative who asked defenders of affirmative action, who say that taking race into account is the key to getting into college. Tells something about “the whole person”.

CNBC Politics

Read more about CNBC’s politics coverage:

  • Biden threatens to impose higher taxes on oil companies if they don’t work to lower gas prices
  • Paul Pelosi attacker David Depp struck with federal criminal charges of attempted kidnapping, retaliation against government official
  • Op-ed: Democrats are better for our country and economy
  • Democrats hold slim lead over GOP rivals in key Senate races in PA, GA and AZ, new polls show
  • Supreme Court hears arguments challenging use of caste in college admissions
  • Co-defendants in SEC civil fraud complaint against fake billionaire Justin Costello agree to settle case
  • The intruder at Pelosi’s house shouted ‘Where’s Nancy?’ Before attacking the husband with the hammer, the source said
  • SEC Chairman Gary Gensler defends controversial clawback rule, saying it won’t prevent companies from going public
  • Trump loses latest court bid to block Congress from receiving income tax returns
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren says big banks fail to prevent ‘massive’ fraud on payments platform Zelle, urges CFPB to toughen rules
  • White House Chief of Staff Ron Klein warns after former Trump official Stephen Miller flagged Hatch Act violations
  • GOP Representative Liz Cheney backs Representative Alyssa Slotkin in her first endorsement of Democrats in tight Michigan House race
  • ‘We’re going to hang you’: DOJ cracks down on threats to election workers before high-stakes midterm

Students for Fair Admissions is seeking to overturn a Supreme Court decision in Gutter v. Bollinger, which found in 2003 that colleges may consider race in their admissions to diverse campuses.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, took race into account to help black Americans access the parts of society that were disenfranchised during slavery.

“You’re assuming that race is the only factor that drives someone in,” Sotomayor said, referring to admission to a liberal justice college.

Justice Elena Kagan returned to the 14th Amendment issue hours later when she asked U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Preloger explicitly what a so-called originalist would think of affirmative action to implement that amendment. Fundamentalists like Thomas say that their decisions are guided by what the Constitution originally meant, not by changing social customs.

“An originalist feels that this is clearly in line with the original understanding of the 14th Amendment,” Preller said.

But Strawbridge said Asian applicants have been harmed by affirmative action policies that benefited Black applications, a factor he argued underscored the unfairness and unconstitutionality of those policies.

“Some castes get benefits, some castes don’t,” he said.

Strawbridge said the use of race to determine who goes to college is “inherently divisive.”

Sotomayor challenged Strawbridge to come up with any instances in court records where an applicant entered college because of his race.

She and other liberal justices argued in their questions that race was but one of many factors influencing how colleges determine who gets admitted.

One of the judges, Ketanji Brown Jackson, said, “They’re looking at a person complete with all these characteristics.”

He questioned how applicants of a college were harmed by the use of affirmative action, which was redressable under the law.

Conservatives hold a 6-3 supremacy over the Supreme Court and are expected to be open to arguments to end affirmative action.

“I’ve heard the word diversity many times, and I don’t mean it,” said Thomas, who was only the second black person appointed to the Supreme Court after North Carolina Solicitor General Ryan Park began. His argument defending the UNC’s use of affirmative action.

“It seems like everything matters to everyone,” Thomas said.

Thomas said he “didn’t put much stock” in arguments for the benefits of diversity because he had heard similar arguments in favor of segregation.

The cases being argued are Students for Fair Admission v. President and Fellows of Harvard, Case No. 20-1199, and Students for Fair Admission v. University of North Carolina, Case No. 21-707.

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Credit: www.cnbc.com /

- Advertisement -

Recent Articles

Related Stories