Facebook has recently taken a harsher tone toward whistleblower Frances Haugen, suggesting that the social network giant may be considering legal retaliation after Haugen went public with internal research, which she said earlier this year. I had copied before leaving my job.
US law protects whistleblowers who disclose information about potential misconduct to the government. But this protection is not necessary for taking corporate secrets to the media.
Facebook still has a fine line to walk. The company will have to weigh whether suing Haugen, who denies other employees who may speak otherwise, is worth casting himself as a legal Godzilla ready to stomp on a woman who She says she is doing just the right thing.
Facebook did not respond to emailed questions.
What did Haugen do?
Hogen secretly copied a slew of internal Facebook documents before leaving the company, and his lawyers later filed a complaint with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, alleging that Facebook was not aware of the negative effects of its platform. He hides what he knows.
His attorney, John Tye, said the team provided the revised documents to Congress, where Haugen testified Tuesday, and also informed officials in California. Haugen also shared documents with the Wall Street Journal, which he began talking to in December, leading to a series of explosive stories that began in mid-September.
How did Facebook react?
The company says that it has been misrepresented. “I think most of us don’t recognize the false picture of the company that is being portrayed,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote to employees on Tuesday.
Some company executives have even begun using harsh language to describe Haugen’s actions that could be interpreted as threatening.
In an Associated Press interview on Thursday, Facebook executive Monica Bickert repeatedly referred to documents copied by Hogen as “stolen,” a term she has also used in other media interviews.
- Whistleblower testifies that Facebook chooses profit over security
- Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp back online after global outage
David Colapinto, attorney for Kohn, Cohn and Colapinto, a Washington-based company that specializes in whistleblower cases, said the language was threatening.
In the same interview, when asked whether Facebook would sue or retaliate against the whistleblower, Bickert said, “I can’t answer that.”
A week ago, Facebook’s global security chief, Antigone Davis, testified before a US Senate committee that Facebook would “never retaliate against anyone for talking to Congress,” which left open the possibility that the company’s document Can go after him to give. Journal.
Hagen is protected?
Various laws provide whistleblower protection at both the state and federal level. Federal laws that apply to Hogen are the Dodd-Frank Act, the 2010 Wall Street Reform Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a 2002 law that followed the collapse of Enron and other accounting scandals.
Dodd-Frank expanded protections for whistleblowers and empowered the SEC to take action against a company that threatens whistleblowers. Experts say protections exist for both employees and former employees.
- Facebook whistleblower alleges social network fueled US Capital riot
When asked about his exposure to the media, Haugen’s attorney, Ty, says that because Haugen went to the SEC, Congress and state officials, he deserves whistleblower protection. He said any lawsuit on Facebook’s part would be “frivolous” and that Facebook has not been in touch.
What about his leaks in the media?
Courts have not tested whether leaking to the media is safe under Dodd-Frank, but Colapinto said the US Secretary of Labor determined decades ago that environmental and nuclear-safety whistleblowers’ communications with the media were secure.
Facebook can allege that Haugen defamed Facebook by sharing company documents with the press, leaking trade secrets or just making comments, said Lisa Banks of the Washington law firm Katz, Marshall & Banks, who worked on the whistleblower cases. has done. decade. “Like many whistleblowers, she is exceptionally brave and puts herself at personal and professional risk to shine a light on these practices,” she said.
Could Facebook be in shock?
Facebook probably wants its hidden threats to harass other employees or former employees, who may be tempted to speak up. “If they go after him, it’s not because they necessarily think they have a strong case legally, but sending the message to other people that they intend to play hardball,” Banks said.
But she said it would be a “disaster” for Facebook to follow Haugen. Despite the potential legal vulnerabilities, Facebook could look like a bully if it pursued a legal case against it.