Permissive culture towards fraud must be stopped, says House of Lords committee

- Advertisement -


a

According to the House of Lords committee, a “permissive culture” exists around fraud, and more involved action is needed to prevent scams from happening in the first place.

- Advertisement -

The Fraud Act 2006 and the Digital Fraud Committee urged that a new corporate criminal offense of “failure to prevent fraud” be introduced to help encourage all industries to play their part in combating scams.

- Advertisement -

The committee said the telecom sector should do more to tackle scam messages before they reach the victims and combat spoof calls, while the tech sector should do more to woo consumers using online advertising and social media platforms. Cheaters should be braked.

It said the plan to hold platforms for online fraudulent advertisements appearing on their services through an online protection bill should not be allowed to slide and should be strengthened.

- Advertisement -

The private sector should be encouraged to tackle fraud not only by facing the threat of corporate criminal liability or regulatory action, but also through the creation of a safe harbor for data sharing.

Meanwhile, the financial services sector has “sprung into action” due to the burden of reimbursement of customers lost due to fraud, the committee said.

“Unless all fraud-enabled industries fear significant financial, legal and reputational risk for their failure to prevent fraud, they will not act,” the report said.

It continued: “The private sector is encouraged to combat fraud not only by facing the threat of corporate criminal liability or regulatory action, but also through the creation of a safe harbor for data sharing for the purposes of preventing fraud.” should go.

“It is only through a holistic approach that covers every part of the fraud chain that fraud can be stopped before the money is deducted from the victim’s account.”

The committee suggested that payments should be delayed in certain circumstances to give banks more time to review risks and contact customers.

When fraudulent payments slip through the net, it should not be the responsibility of the financial services sector, especially the victim’s banks, to collect the bills, it said.

All stakeholders in the fraud chain, including the recipient’s bank, should be aware that they have a duty to prevent fraud and address their failures and victims’ losses once they occur.

“All stakeholders in the fraud chain, including the payee’s bank, should be aware that they have a duty to prevent fraud and address their failures and victims’ losses once they occur,” the report said.

The committee called for a “united, centrally-led public awareness campaign that goes beyond the best practice demonstrated in public health campaigns” to help combat fraud.

The report said: “Without fear of facing investigation or justice, organized criminals around the world turn to the UK as a lucrative market to commit fraud.

“They know they can operate with limited fear of prosecution or redress for their crimes, the proceeds of which they use to fund further criminal activity, including human trafficking and the drug trade, and that they Have no respect for your victims.”

Law enforcement agencies are “short of time” to fight fraud and that the UK’s reporting center for fraud and cybercrime Action Fraud is passive and misunderstood, the committee said.

The report said: “The effect of such a low priority is to create a permissive culture in government and law enforcement agencies towards fraud and perpetrators of it.

“This then spreads through influencing the attitudes of private sector players in the fraud chain, describing the steps involved in the fraud, which have taken consumers to do whatever they can to prevent being scammed. Haven’t taken action.”

The committee said the “alphabet soup” of bodies responsible for fighting fraud is ineffective, and creates a culture of void of responsibility and blame-shifting.

It said a cabinet sub-committee should be constituted with a clear mandate to deal with frauds.

The report states that fraud is the most commonly experienced crime in England and Wales, accounting for about 41% of all crimes against individuals.

“If citizens were being duped regularly and millions of pounds were stolen from their wallets in broad daylight, then every organization involved in allowing this to happen would have no choice but to deal swiftly, and criminals will be brought to justice in the court,” it said.

“Since the majority of fraud now takes place online and often involves the social engineering of the victim, the rapid rise in fraud and scams has been invisible and the fraudsters have little risk of being caught. This has got to stop.”

The report said that after being socialized by fraudsters, many victims would face a crisis of confidence and confidence in the authorities and people would be lost.

If people were being dragged for thousands of pounds in broad daylight, this would not be allowed to happen and would continue

Speaking to the PA news agency, committee chair Baroness Morgan said fraud is often viewed as “a hidden online victimless crime where people can be paid and it all goes well”.

She continued: “It’s really missing the thing about the devastation — the emotional devastation — that it can create guilt.

“And this would not be allowed to happen, and go on, if people were being robbed for thousands of pounds in broad daylight.”

Baroness Morgan also stated that there is “the misconception that different institutions cannot talk to each other, share data when they know people are potentially being duped”.

Referring to the effects fraud has had on society, he told the PA: “If you talk to any victims, as we have done, who have been cheated, it’s not just about the money, It is about a breach of trust.

“And it is emotionally devastating and people (find it) very difficult to trust again any institution that asks for your details or (when) buys things online.

The lack of a joint approach between different business sectors is stalling the fight against fraud and exposing consumers to unscrupulous scammers.

“People are afraid it’s going to happen to them again. So I think it’s really a huge issue affecting consumer confidence.

“And as people are buying more online, they need to be able to shop with confidence, to be able to transfer money – and to know that fraud is actually being cracked down on every part of the chain. “

Rocio concha, which one? The director of policy and advocacy said: “The lack of a joint approach among different business sectors is stalling the fight against fraud and exposing consumers to unscrupulous scammers.”

A government spokesman said: “We are fully committed to preventing hard-working poachers from stealing cash from hard-working families.

“We will be publishing our fraud strategy shortly, explaining how we will prevent fraud attempts at the source, empower potential victims to recognize and avoid fraud, and prosecute more perpetrators.”

Alex Davis-Jones, Labor’s shadow minister for digital and technology, said: “Labour has been pushing the government for years to strengthen protections against fraud and scams.”

Credit: www.standard.co.uk /

- Advertisement -

Recent Articles

Related Stories